Everything about Will Philosophy totally explained
Will, or willpower, is a
philosophical concept that's defined in several different ways.
Will as internal drive
Nietzsche defines will similarly to the "any internally motivated action" usage, but more narrowly. In this sense, will is more a "creative spark," a certain independence and stubbornness. A person who chooses not to steal because the
Ten Commandments said so wouldn't be exercising their will, because it was their
choice to follow the Ten Commandments. Someone who independently forms their own moral system or who composes a musical composition pleasing to themself, however, would be exercising will.
Idealism: Will as all
In idealist models of reality, the material world is either non-existent or is a secondary artifact of the "true" world of ideas. In such worlds, it can be said that
everything is an act of will. Even if you're arrested by the police, this is actually an act of your will, too; if you didn't want it to happen, you could have decided otherwise. This line of thought is seen among philosophers such as
Arthur Schopenhauer in his book
The World as Will and Representation; it's also seen in proponents of a spiritual or mystical universe such as the
New Thought writers
Frank Channing Haddock (
The Power of Will) and
William Walker Atkinson (
Personal Power Volume V: Will Power), and the
occult writer
Aleister Crowley.
Free Will
The standard use of this term is as a distinction between internally motivated and caused events and external events. Jumping off a cliff would be an act of free will; accidentally falling or being pushed off a cliff wouldn't be an act of free will.
Some people believe that seemingly "free" actions aren't actually free, or that the entire concept is a . The argument generally goes along the lines that since "internal" beliefs are affected by earlier external events, nothing is truly an internal choice, because everything you do is . Alternately, if there's no foreordained future, we may be at the mercy of the randomness of chance, which may also negate free will. Such is the definition for materialists.
For both classical and natural law thinkers, human nature can be divided into three parts, reason, will, and appetite. Reason can be divided into at least two categories, theoretical reason and practical reason. Will can also be divided into two categories, that which pushes away and that which pulls toward (anger and desire). A "free will" here's defined as a "rational appetite." In other words, when a person correctly identifies what "is" or "exists" through theoretical reason, and that person correctly discerns what is perfective and fulfilling of that which exists and therefore how to act according to practical reason, and then does that, one has a free will, or a will capable of overriding and reorganizing the appetite. The materialist view is criticized for being self-contradictory. In other words, the materialist or "naturalist" who doesn't believe in free will, must consider his actions and consciousness illusory. Since reason and action, under the materialist model are nothing more than what must happen due to cause-effect relationships. This view is self contradictory because if our reason is nothing but an illusion cast out by the cause-effect relationships of chemical reactions in the brain, then we've no certainty that our reason tells us anything true, and therefore no reason to believe our brain to be composed of chemicals and reactions, no reason to believe our reason guiding us to the materialists explanation is true.
In related disciplines
Psychologists also deal with issues of will; some people are highly
intrinsically motivated and do whatever seems best to them, while others are "weak-willed" and easily suggestible (extrinsicly motivated) by society or outward inducement. They also study the phenomenon of
Akrasia, wherein people seemingly act against their best interests and know that they're doing so (for instance, restarting cigarette smoking after having intellectually decided to quit). Advocates of
Sigmund Freud's psychology stress the importance of the influence of the
unconscious mind upon the apparent conscious exercise of will.
The sociologist
Ferdinand Tönnies, in analysing group psychology, distinguishes between will directed at furthering the interests of the group (
Wesenwille or "essential will"), and will directed at furthering individual goals (
Kürwille or "arbitrary will").
Further Information
Get more info on 'Will Philosophy'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://will__philosophy.totallyexplained.com">Will (philosophy) Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
